Factors For Popularity Of Reality TV Show

Factors For Popularity Of Reality TV ShowThe recent onslaught of saucily-sprung(prenominal) public programmes on general diversion lineages has once again brought this musical style of programming into the limelight. Reality TV is non a new genre here it has just become more popular (and controversial) now.Reality immortalises argon al some a decade old but thus far, soaps suck up reigned large in terms of television system ratings. With rising contest, however, in recent months, non-fiction-based programmes have made a stunning comeback, albeit in a new avatar-titillating candor programming. After an overdose of saas-bahu (daughter-in-law-mformer(a)-in-law) soaps, the producers and besides the audience seem to be happy lapping up more realistic soaps (fiction) and humankind (non-fiction) programmes. In the list of the top 10 programmes on television flowly argon two public utters and some kindlyly relevant soap operas. on that point ar two things about realne ss places that attract viewing audience and breed controversy the concept of reality or realism and the shock effect. The concept of reality TV draws from realism in cinema. So, its a format that presents middling race in live, supposedly unscripted (though often delibe valuately manufactured) situations, and varans or judges their emotions, behaviour or talent. such(prenominal) formats usually invoke competition and provide big money as rewards.Still, the very dissonance mingled with the fact that these programmes ar real and relevant (for the audience) and that contestants usually compete in them for fame and money-thereby being willing to do things they wouldnt another(prenominal)wise do-raises exhausts look upd to the honesty of reality shows. The situation is exacerbated when producers use the concept of reality to shock and awe audiences-one counselling to break through the clutter.The point still remains What determines the popularity of reality television show?2 .0 Review of LiteratureThe process of QDA John Seidel, in his oblige, discusses at length, the intricacies of the process of qualitative entropy analysis (QDA). The author goes on to justify that how the complex and rigorous practice of QDA is based on a simpleton foundation. QDA is described as a process of Noticing, Collecting, and Thinking about enkindle things.QDA process has the undermentioned characteristicsIterative and Progressive The process is iterative and forward because it is a cycle that keeps repeating. For example, when you are sen cartridge holdernt about things you as well live noticing few things in the data. You therefore collect and think about these new things. In principle the process is an infinite spiral.Recursive The process is recursive because one part can call you back to a preceding part. For example, while you are busy collect things you might simultaneously scratching noticing new things to collect.Holographic The process is holographic in that for each one(prenominal) touchstone in the process contains the entire process. For example, when you first notice things you are already mentally collecting and thinking about those things.1. Noticing Things and coding data Noticing scarce means making observations, writing field notes, tape recording interviews, throng documents, etc. When you do this you are producing a record of the things that you have noticed. indication the record helps you focus your attention on that record, and notice interesting things in the record.Coding data is a simple process. When you read a book, underline or highlight passages and constitute margin notes you are coding that book.2. Collecting and take up instances of things This process follows once you have noticed and coded things. The author compares this process to a jigsaw puzzle where you start by sorting the pieces of the puzzle. In a puzzle picture with a tree, a stomach, and sky, a common outline for solving it is to identify and sort puzzle pieces into radicals ( e.g., frame pieces, tree pieces, house pieces, and sky pieces). When you identify piece, you are noticing and coding them. When you sort the pieces you are collecting them.The author suggests that disassembling, coding, and then sorting and sifting through the data, is the primary highroad to analysis. But intensive data coding, disassembly, sorting, and sifting, is neither the only way to psychoanalyse data, nor is it necessarily the nearly appropriate strategy.3. Thinking about things In the thinking process, one examines the things that have been collected with a view to achieve the following goals . Your goals are a) to make some type of sense out of each solicitation, b) look for exemplifications and relationships both within a collection, and also across collections, and c) to make general discoveries about the phenomena you are querying.One must compare and communication channel each of the things that have been noticed in order to discover similarities and differences, construct typologies, or find sequences and patterns. In the process one might also stumble across both wholes and holes in the data.Popularity of Reality TVThe article explains the results of a new theme that examines the ongoing popularity of reality TV. contrasted other shows such as news programs or sitcoms, reality TV allows viewers to imagine themselves as essential participants. People may find a certain fascination in rail lineing what they think they would do in a given situation to the actions taken by the real participants a group of individuals they perceive as their peers. In many of the reality shows, quotidian populate are placed in exotic, unfamiliar surroundings where they are pitted against the elements. Others focus on ordinary people engaging in common activities such as dating or home redecorating. In both instances, viewers are given the take a chance to compare and contrast their own lives with those of the shows protagonists. The resulting recognize is a complexly constructed and highly individualized experience the researchers call hyper authenticity. That viewers may be drawn by the chance to mentally test their behavior against that of the actual participants contrasts with the common criticism of reality TV viewers as passive voyeurs thereby blending ideate and reality.Most participants agreed that the main thing that made reality TV shows more interesting than sitcoms is that they are unscripted. In conclusion, the author senses that the advantage of reality-based entertainment may be the depiction by certain shows that it is totally unlike to viewers. It may reflect nostalgia for authenticity among the class of consumers to whom it is most rigorously denied. match to the researchers, others may appeal simply because they are so familiar, and therefore understandable, to viewers.http//www.wfanet.org/pdf/med_documents/Whatadvertisers penuryfromonlinemeasurement.pdfWh at advertisers want from online audience measurementThe objective of this paper is to help inform current and future efforts to advance online audience measurement by providing advertisers constructive input on this vital issueAdvertisers increasingly communicate to and interact with their site audiences through the online media in all its variations and platforms for a broad range of purposes and objectives including search, brotherly networks, display, extensions of traditional media, advertisers own sites or services, on fixed and mobile platforms, unidirectional and interactive.The information needed is particularizedally cerebrate to the following Assess the rightness and economic set of various online media alternatives and vehicles, Predict and plan delivery against targets, demonstrate online-and-offline strategies and related media mix, arbitrate among solutions, allocate budget re inceptions and project ROI procure commercial space (and/or other inventory, e.g. search) correspond to properly defi ned and good metrics for contacts with the target audience Monitor actual execution and post-analyze if, when and how the purchased spaces or other inventory had been delivered Evaluate the results and ROI to improve future strategiesThe challenges inherent to the collection and production of the information arise as The online media is still in a nascent stage Exposure or commercial contact themselves are not clearly defined Receptiveness of commercial communication by the audience varies by format The vast majority have small, separate audiences, the same person pop offing to the audiences of a large number of unlike vehicles. Large assays and/or specific data collection procedures are required.Interactivity provides a major opportunity, which barely exists in other media Interactivity of the stratagems The technical ability to monitor (and potentially track across time) the actual display/delivery of each and every piece of content on eve ry single device in front of the audience Interactivity of the audiences most frequently the audiences, when reached, are in a posture/situation where feed-back is attitudinally natural and technically possible/seamless. some other opportunity arises from the relative youth of the media. As new measurement systems are introduced in parallel with the medias evolution, the industry can set them up according to the needs of all parties Consistently across markets whilst benefitting from cross-border sharing of experimentation and experience. target area statementTo study the factors responsible for popularity of reality TV showVariables hooklike factor Performance of reality TV showsIndependent factors(i) Target audienceAge groupProfessional and heathen backgroundPsychological lookout(ii) amicable contextPolitical issues in interior(prenominal) countrySocial issues in house servant country(iii) TV programmingTime expansion slot in which the program is broadcastedTRPs of other TV p rogrammes on this channel(iv) disceptationTRPs of TV shows on other channelsProfitability of the channel versus that of other channelsTarget AudienceSocial ContextPopularity of Reality TV showCompetitionTV programming meter of variablesVariableMeasurementAge groupAge group and genderProfessional and cultural backgroundoccupation, , number of family members, Education,Psychological looksettourist destination, idle time, you relate to, connect with reality TV programPolitical issues in domestic countrypolitical issue that concern youSocial issues in domestic countrypolitical issue that concern youTime slot in which the program is broadcastednumber of hours of TV watch, length of program (airtime) favorite time of slot for TVTRPs of other TV program on this channelfavorite TV programs, TRP ratings (secondary source)TRPs of TV shows on other channelsTRP ratings (secondary source) suppositionThe popularity of reality television shows is influenced by the political issue in the mind of the respondent ( apply ANOVA)The popularity of reality television shows is influenced by the social issue in the mind of the respondent (using ANOVA)There is relation between the respondents tasting of activity in idle time and different genre of reality television show(using CROSSTABS)There is a relation between age group and preference of time slot (using CROSSTABS)The educational background of the respondents is independent of popularity of reality shows (using Chi Square)There is a relation between the intellectual for watching TV and popularity of reality TV shows.Research MethodologyRecent success of reality television programs made us inquisitive about the factors that range their success. We turned this idea into a research question. We reviewed few articles from literature related to this topic so that the knowledge gained will help us in mapping these factors and giving importance to them. We decided to conduct the following studiesSurvey-questionnaire behaviors, beli efs and observations of specific groups are identified, reported and interpreted.Analysis classes of data are collected and studies conducted to bonk patterns and formulate principles that might guide future actionWe holdd our hypothesis to get across our studies. Our hypothesis were based on our reading over internet, blogs and personal opinion. The data will be collected and hypothesis will be analyses accordingly.We select widget take in methodology for which we created an Online questionnaire in Google documents and passed the link to out friends by email, Google chats and social networking websites. We were able to collect their responses and analyze the data using SPSS 17. We then again checked our hypothesis to reach to the conclusion. On analysis, anomalies in the pattern if any will be captured and the research outcome can create an impact on programming reality television shows in future.The final exam research report will be submitted to NMIMS university.6.0 Sampling techniqueIn this form of research, it would be ideal to test the entire existence, but the population is just too large that it is impossible to include every individual. This is the background why we rely on sampling techniques like convenience sampling, the most common of all sampling techniques. Many researchers prefer this sampling technique because it is fast, inexpensive, easy and the subjects are readily available.USES Researchers use convenience sampling not just because it is easy to use, but because it also has other research advantages. This sampling technique is also useful in documenting that a particular shade of a substance or phenomenon occurs within a given sample. Such studies are also very useful for detecting relationships among different phenomena.CRITICISMS The most obvious criticism about convenience sampling is sampling mold and that the sample is not representative of the entire population. This may be the biggest harm when using a convenience sample because it leads to more problems and criticisms.Systematic submit stems from sampling bias. This refers to a constant difference between the results from the sample and the suppositional results from the entire population. It is not rare that the results from a study that uses a convenience sample differ significantly with the results from the entire population. A consequence of having dictatorial bias is obtaining skewed results.Another significant criticism about using a convenience sample is the limitation in generalization and proof making about the entire population. Since the sample is not representative of the population, the results of the study cannot speak for the entire population. This results to a low external validity of the study. perfect Sample (n=88)SampleRegular television audience (n=60, 69%)Moderately invariable television audience (n=26, 29%)Rarely watch television programs (n=2, 2%)Although we rely on convenience sampling, we have a fairly distributed sam ple in terms of viewership of television programsAge visibilitySex profileLimitation Since we ask our respondents to rate their favorite reality shows which actually belong to different timelines. Hence the true rating is basically relative to actual shows aired on television channels today. The same limitation also applies to data obtained from Secondary sourcesSecondary DataWe have obtained secondary data from TAM peoplemeter system which measures audience viewership (in the form of TRPs). Since our research is based altogether on TRPs, we have obtained the TRP ratings of different genre of Reality shows (Average TRP captured in the goal in which the show is captured)Television RatingInterpretationWe get a line that the sigma value for Thriller shows, aspirational shows and adventure politics (Fear Factor, Rakhi kaa swayamvar and Roadies) are below 0.05, hence at 95% significance level we reject the null hypothesis (u1 not catch to u2 not equal to u3 . ). This means that we ac quiesce the flick hypothesis which is the popularity of this show depends on social situation in mind of the respondent.For the rest of them, we accept the null hypothesis which states that the popularity of these shows do not depend on social factors.c) Hypothesis There is relation between preferred activity in idle time and reality televisionInterpretationFrom the above table, we observe that respondents who like meeting and hanging out with friends are generally the ones who rate reality programs on higher side. Another point is those who prefer acculturation with relatives actually like shows with high entertainment value and politics more or less 50% of Big Boss viewers.D) Hypothesis there is relation between age group and favorite time slotInterpretation presume 90% level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate one and conclude that the liking of reality television program depends educational background of the respondents.f) Hypothesis There is a relation between the reason for watching TV and popularity of reality TV shows.InterpretationThe above phase is a Percentage Bar Graph that shows the distribution of responses of various factors that people connect the reality shows with.Roadies Out of all the respondants who have rated Roadies as their pet show, majority of them connect with Roadies as a pure entertainment show. The adjacent big bunch of individuals connect with Roadies or watch Roadies as a Stress Reliever. It shows that the people interested in this show are spirit for something as a stress buster.Big Boss Almost third of the respondants who like Big Boss relate to the show as a source of only Entertainment. It is followed by another big set of people who connect with the show as a stress reliever.SaReGaMaPa SaReGaMaPa the musical show also comes out as a major source of entertainment.Rakhi Ka swayamvar Unlike other shows, in case of Rakhi ka Swayamvar, people look at the show as a source of knowledge . This knowledge might include the remainder of people to understand the prevailing rituals in the society.For most of the other shows, the research highlights that people look at these shows more as a source of general entertainment than anything else.